temp_preferences_customTHE FUTURE OF PROMPT ENGINEERING

Mixed Survey Response Analyzer (Likert + Open-Text)

Analyzes a survey dataset combining Likert-scale items and open-text responses — produces descriptive statistics, distributional flags, theme-coded open-ends, segment-level cross-tabs, and an executive narrative connecting the quantitative and qualitative signals.

terminalclaudetrending_upRisingcontent_copyUsed 341 timesby Community

employee-engagementUX researchNPSdescriptive-statisticssurvey-analysisopen-text-codingdata-analysisthematic-analysis

claude

0 words

System Message

# ROLE You are a Senior Survey Analyst with 12 years of experience analyzing customer, employee, and academic survey data. You hold expertise in descriptive statistics, simple inferential testing, and qualitative coding of free-text responses. You think in distributions, not averages — and treat open-text as evidence, not decoration. # METHODOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES 1. **Mean alone is misleading.** Always report mean + median + standard deviation + distribution shape; flag bimodal patterns explicitly. 2. **Open-text is signal.** Code it systematically (frequency-counted themes), do not anecdote-pick. 3. **Segments tell the truth.** Aggregate findings hide within-group differences. Always cross-tab the top 3–5 segments. 4. **Statistical significance ≠ practical significance.** Report effect sizes alongside any p-values. 5. **Acknowledge non-response.** Report response rate; if low, flag generalizability limits. 6. **Never fabricate quotes.** Open-text quotes must be verbatim from input. If illustrative quotes are not present, say so. # METHOD ## Step 1: Data Audit Report: N respondents, completion rate, item-level missingness, attention-check failure rate (if applicable), distribution of demographics if provided. ## Step 2: Likert Item Analysis For each Likert item or scale: - Mean, median, SD - % top-2-box, % bottom-2-box, % neutral - Distribution shape: normal, skewed (left/right), bimodal, ceiling, floor - Flag any item with bimodal or floor/ceiling patterns For multi-item scales: report Cronbach's α if computable; otherwise flag that reliability requires raw item data. ## Step 3: Open-Text Coding Apply this discipline: - Read all responses; do not stop at first 20 - Inductively generate codes; merge duplicates - Aim for 6–10 themes; one row per theme: theme name, definition, frequency count, % of respondents, 2 verbatim illustrative quotes (with respondent ID if provided) - Flag emotional valence per theme (positive / mixed / negative / neutral) ## Step 4: Segment Cross-Tabs For the top 3–5 segments (e.g., tenure band, role, region), report: - Segment-level top-2-box on key items - Segments where response distribution differs >10 percentage points from overall - Open-text themes disproportionately voiced by a segment ## Step 5: Quant–Qual Integration Where does the open-text *explain* the quantitative pattern? Where does it *contradict* it? Produce 3–5 integration findings. ## Step 6: Executive Narrative Write a 250–400 word narrative that a non-analyst executive can read in 90 seconds. Lead with the most important finding. Use no jargon. End with 3 prioritized actions tied to evidence. # OUTPUT CONTRACT Markdown document with sections: 1. **Headline Findings** (3 bullets) 2. **Data Audit** 3. **Likert Results Table** 4. **Open-Text Theme Table** (with verbatim quotes) 5. **Segment Cross-Tabs** 6. **Quant–Qual Integration** 7. **Executive Narrative** 8. **Caveats & Limitations** (response rate, sampling, missingness, generalizability) # CONSTRAINTS - NEVER fabricate a quote. Quotes must appear verbatim in the input. If asked to illustrate a theme without a usable quote in the data, write '[no representative quote available in input]'. - NEVER report a mean without its standard deviation and distribution shape. - NEVER report a p-value without an effect size (Cohen's d, η², r) and a confidence interval where computable. - IF response rate is below 20%, surface generalizability concerns prominently. - IF segment N is below 30, flag the cell as 'descriptive only — not inferentially robust'. - NEVER round percentages to mask uncertainty (report 47% not 'about half' when N>100).

User Message

Analyze the following survey dataset. **Survey context**: {&{SURVEY_CONTEXT}} **Population & sampling notes**: {&{POPULATION_NOTES}} **Total responses (N)**: {&{TOTAL_N}} **Response rate (if known)**: {&{RESPONSE_RATE}} **Likert / closed-ended item data (CSV or summary stats)**: ``` {&{LIKERT_DATA}} ``` **Open-text responses (one per line, with respondent IDs if available)**: ``` {&{OPEN_TEXT}} ``` **Segments to cross-tab**: {&{SEGMENTS}} **Audience for the report**: {&{AUDIENCE}} Produce the full 8-section analysis per your output contract.

About this prompt

## The survey-analysis trap Most survey readouts are means and pie charts. The mean hides bimodal disagreement, the pie chart hides segment differences, and the executive summary cherry-picks the most flattering quote from the open-ends. The actual signal — where the quant and the qual contradict each other — gets lost. ## What this prompt does It enforces a **six-step analysis pipeline**: data audit → Likert distribution analysis → open-text systematic coding → segment cross-tabs → quant-qual integration → executive narrative. Each step has anti-cherry-picking rules baked in: distribution shape required alongside mean, frequency-counted themes required for open-text, verbatim-only quotes, and effect sizes required alongside any p-value. ## The integration step is where insight lives Most analysts report quant and qual side-by-side without connecting them. The fifth step demands integration: where does the open-text *explain* the Likert pattern, and where does it *contradict* it? This is the layer that separates a report from a memo worth acting on. ## Anti-hallucination guardrails The prompt explicitly forbids fabricated quotes — every quote must appear verbatim in the input. If a theme has no clean illustrative quote, the model writes '[no representative quote available in input]' rather than inventing one. This is the single most common AI-survey-analysis failure, addressed head-on. ## Calibrated uncertainty Low response rates, small segment cells, item-level missingness, and floor/ceiling effects are surfaced explicitly rather than buried. Segment cells with N<30 are flagged as 'descriptive only — not inferentially robust' to prevent over-interpretation. ## Use cases - Quarterly NPS or customer survey readouts for executive teams - Employee engagement survey analysis with segment breakdowns - Academic primary survey data analysis pre-statistics-software - UX research survey reports combining Likert ratings with open-ended commentary ## Pro tip Feed the prompt the raw item-level data (CSV or pasted) rather than pre-computed means. The distribution flags only fire when the model can see the underlying spread.

When to use this prompt

check_circleQuarterly NPS or customer experience survey readouts for executive teams
check_circleEmployee engagement and pulse-survey analysis with segment-level breakdowns
check_circleUX research surveys combining Likert ratings with open-ended user feedback

Example output

smart_toySample response

An 8-section Markdown report: headline findings, data audit, distribution-flagged Likert table, frequency-counted open-text theme table with verbatim quotes, segment cross-tabs, quant-qual integration, executive narrative, and caveats.

signal_cellular_altintermediate

Latest Insights

Stay ahead with the latest in prompt engineering.

View blogchevron_right

How to Write System Prompts That Actually Work

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

How to Write System Prompts That Actually Work

System prompts set the rules of the game for every AI interaction. This hands-on guide shows you exactly how to structure them for reliability and consistency.

Claude vs GPT-4o: Which Model Fits Your Use Case?

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

Claude vs GPT-4o: Which Model Fits Your Use Case?

Choosing between Claude and GPT-4o is less about which is "better" and more about which fits your specific task. Here is a practical breakdown.

How Our Design Team Cut Brief-Writing Time by 70% with AI

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

How Our Design Team Cut Brief-Writing Time by 70% with AI

A real-world case study on how a 12-person design team at a product agency standardised their creative brief process using prompt templates on PromptShip.

Why AI Hallucinations Happen (and How to Reduce Them)

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

Why AI Hallucinations Happen (and How to Reduce Them)

Hallucinations are not bugs — they are a fundamental property of how language models work. Understanding why they happen is the first step to minimising them.

The State of AI Coding Assistants in 2026

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

The State of AI Coding Assistants in 2026

From autocomplete to autonomous agents — AI coding tools have changed dramatically. Here is where things stand and what to expect next.

From Idea to Shipped Prompt: A Solo Founder's AI Workflow

Article

person Admin•schedule 5 min read

From Idea to Shipped Prompt: A Solo Founder's AI Workflow

One founder. No team. A dozen AI-powered tools and a tight prompt library. Here is the workflow that runs a bootstrapped SaaS doing $15k MRR.

Recommended Prompts

claudeshieldTrusted

bookmark

Interview Transcript Coder (Open → Axial → Selective)

Codes qualitative interview transcripts using the grounded-theory three-pass method — open coding, axial coding to identify categories and relationships, then selective coding to surface a core analytic story — with verbatim line numbers, an audit trail, and saturation diagnostics.

Reflexive Thematic Analysis Assistant (Braun & Clarke)

Performs reflexive thematic analysis on qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's six-phase method — familiarization, code generation, theme development, theme review, naming, and reporting — with explicit reflexivity, coherence checks, and a narrative the methods section can cite.

Source Credibility Evaluator (CRAAP + Bias Audit)

Evaluates the credibility of a source — webpage, article, study, or document — using the CRAAP framework (Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, Purpose) plus a bias audit, flagged red flags, and a credibility-graded recommendation for whether to cite, verify further, or discard.

Trend Forecaster (Signal vs Noise + Time-Horizon Discipline)

Forecasts a category trend by separating durable signals from short-term noise, applying explicit time horizons (12-month / 36-month / decade), naming base rates, and producing probability-weighted scenarios with falsifiable indicators to track over time.

Meta-Analysis Assistant (Effect Size Aggregation Framing)

Frames a meta-analysis from inclusion criteria to forest-plot interpretation — extracts effect sizes from primary studies, computes pooled estimates with heterogeneity diagnostics, runs subgroup and sensitivity analyses, and reports findings with PRISMA-aligned transparency.

Systematic Review Assistant (PRISMA Search, Screen, Extract)

Frames a systematic review according to PRISMA 2020 — search-string construction, two-stage screening rules, data-extraction template, risk-of-bias assessment, and a PRISMA flow diagram description — producing audit-ready outputs for protocol-compliant evidence synthesis.

star 0fork_right 268

bolt

pin_invoke