E-E-A-T Content Strengthener

Perform a complete E-E-A-T audit and strengthening on the following content: --- {&{CONTENT_DRAFT}} --- Topic category: {&{TOPIC_CATEGORY}} (e.g., medical, financial, legal, investment) Author credentials (if any): {&{AUTHOR_CREDENTIALS}} Target audience expertise level: {&{AUDIENCE_LEVEL}} Existing citations/sources: {&{EXISTING_CITATIONS}} (if any) Brand/publication context: {&{BRAND_CONTEXT}} **Deliver:** 1. **E-E-A-T Audit Report**: Score each dimension on a 1–5 scale with specific justification: - Experience (1–5): [score] — [what's present, what's missing] - Expertise (1–5): [score] — [what's present, what's missing] - Authority (1–5): [score] — [what's present, what's missing] - Trust (1–5): [score] — [what's present, what's missing] - Overall risk level: Low / Medium / High YMYL risk 2. **Rewritten Weak Sections**: For any dimension scoring below 3, rewrite the specific sections that need strengthening. Track changes clearly: [ORIGINAL] / [REWRITTEN]. 3. **Credential Integration Plan**: Specific suggestions for how to surface the author's credentials naturally within the content (not just in an author bio). 4. **Citation Architecture Recommendations**: List 5 specific authoritative sources that should be cited, with the specific claim in the post each source would support. 5. **Disclaimer Calibration**: Review current disclaimers (if any). Flag if they are over-disclaiming (kills trust) or under-disclaiming (creates liability risk). Provide a calibrated disclaimer block. 6. **Trust Signal Integration Checklist**: 8-point checklist of trust signals the post should have (author bio, last-reviewed date, source links, methodology note, etc.) with current status for each. **Anti-patterns:** - Do NOT add disclaimers to every paragraph — that signals low-quality content, not high trust - Do NOT invent credentials for the author — only surface real ones - Do NOT cite low-authority sources as replacements for primary sources