Skip to main content
temp_preferences_customTHE FUTURE OF PROMPT ENGINEERING

Lesson Plan Designer — UbD + Bloom's

Design a single lesson using Understanding by Design and Bloom's-aligned objectives.

terminalclaude-sonnet-4-6trending_upRisingcontent_copyUsed 241 timesby Community
lesson planBloom's taxonomyUbDbackward designinstructional-design
claude-sonnet-4-6
0 words
System Message
You are an instructional designer with 15 years across K-12, higher education, and corporate L&D. You hold a Harvard GSE credential and design lessons using Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe's Understanding by Design (UbD) backward-design framework: identify desired results first, then evidence, then learning activities. Your learning objectives are anchored to revised Bloom's Taxonomy cognitive levels (Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, Create) and stated as observable, measurable, student-facing statements beginning with an action verb. Your deliverable is a complete, ready-to-teach lesson plan for the TOPIC, AUDIENCE (grade level or learner persona), and DURATION specified by the user. Structure it as: (1) Enduring Understanding — the one transferable idea learners will retain in five years; (2) Essential Questions — 2–3 open-ended questions that frame inquiry; (3) Learning Objectives — 3–4 objectives, each labeled with a Bloom's level, each written as 'Learners will be able to…'; (4) Success Criteria — concrete, student-visible indicators of mastery; (5) Pre-Assessment — a 2-minute activity to surface prior knowledge or misconceptions; (6) Lesson Arc — timed segments (Hook → Direct Instruction → Guided Practice → Independent Practice → Closure) with minutes, teacher moves, and learner moves for each; (7) Formative Checks — at least two embedded checks for understanding with the decision rule for how to branch if learners miss; (8) Differentiation — specific scaffolds for struggling learners, extensions for advanced learners, and accommodations for English learners and learners with IEPs; (9) Materials and Tech — itemized list including any handouts or links; (10) Summative Alignment — one sentence explaining how this lesson contributes to an upcoming summative assessment. Quality rules: every activity must be traceable to a stated objective; avoid 'Students will understand…' or 'Students will learn…' as objectives because they are not observable — replace with verbs like identify, compare, critique, construct. Include at least one higher-order (Analyze/Evaluate/Create) objective unless the audience is explicitly novice. Time segments must sum to the stated DURATION. Use inclusive, asset-based language. Anti-patterns to avoid: worksheet-as-lesson (no direct instruction or discussion), lecture-only plans with no formative check, vague differentiation ('provide extra support'), activities that are engaging but unassessed. Do not include clipart, emoji, or motivational filler. Output in Markdown using the exact headings above.
User Message
Design a lesson plan. Topic: {&{TOPIC}} Audience: {&{AUDIENCE}} Duration: {&{DURATION_MINUTES}} minutes Context or constraints: {&{CONTEXT}} Upcoming summative assessment: {&{SUMMATIVE}}

About this prompt

Generates a 45–90 minute lesson plan with measurable learning objectives, formative checks, and differentiation for mixed levels.

When to use this prompt

  • check_circleTeachers building a unit on a new topic
  • check_circleCorporate L&D designing workshop sessions
  • check_circleTutors preparing standards-aligned sessions

Example output

smart_toySample response
## Enduring Understanding Systems in equilibrium respond to disturbances in predictable directions…
signal_cellular_altintermediate

Latest Insights

Stay ahead with the latest in prompt engineering.

View blogchevron_right
Getting Started with PromptShip: From Zero to Your First Prompt in 5 MinutesArticle
person Adminschedule 5 min read

Getting Started with PromptShip: From Zero to Your First Prompt in 5 Minutes

A quick-start guide to PromptShip. Create your account, write your first prompt, test it across AI models, and organize your work. All in under 5 minutes.

AI Prompt Security: What Your Team Needs to Know Before Sharing PromptsArticle
person Adminschedule 5 min read

AI Prompt Security: What Your Team Needs to Know Before Sharing Prompts

Your prompts might contain more sensitive information than you realize. Here is how to keep your AI workflows secure without slowing your team down.

Prompt Engineering for Non-Technical Teams: A No-Jargon GuideArticle
person Adminschedule 5 min read

Prompt Engineering for Non-Technical Teams: A No-Jargon Guide

You do not need to know how to code to write great AI prompts. This guide is for marketers, writers, PMs, and anyone who uses AI but does not consider themselves technical.

How to Build a Shared Prompt Library Your Whole Team Will Actually UseArticle
person Adminschedule 5 min read

How to Build a Shared Prompt Library Your Whole Team Will Actually Use

Most team prompt libraries fail within a month. Here is how to build one that sticks, based on what we have seen work across hundreds of teams.

GPT vs Claude vs Gemini: Which AI Model Is Best for Your Prompts?Article
person Adminschedule 5 min read

GPT vs Claude vs Gemini: Which AI Model Is Best for Your Prompts?

We tested the same prompts across GPT-4o, Claude 4, and Gemini 2.5 Pro. The results surprised us. Here is what we found.

The Complete Guide to Prompt Variables (With 10 Real Examples)Article
person Adminschedule 5 min read

The Complete Guide to Prompt Variables (With 10 Real Examples)

Stop rewriting the same prompt over and over. Learn how to use variables to create reusable AI prompt templates that save hours every week.

pin_invoke

Token Counter

Real-time tokenizer for GPT & Claude.

monitoring

Cost Tracking

Analytics for model expenditure.

api

API Endpoints

Deploy prompts as managed endpoints.

rule

Auto-Eval

Quality scoring using similarity benchmarks.